Verification System for On-Line Gamers Performing Automatic Verification of Game Results

ABSTRACT

An automatic verification system for automatically verifying a winner of an on-line game is disclosed. The verification system (a server/memory connected to the Internet) contains information about subscriber players and contains accounts that are used for betting on outcomes of skill games. The subscribers access the system via the Internet to set up an on-line game with other subscribers. The players then compete against each other normally via the game (e.g., Halo™) network server. The verification system then automatically receives the final game information from the server or console(s) via an e-mail, or by accessing published results of the game, or by accessing the players&#39; published career summaries. Based on that automatically generated data, the verification system automatically determines the winner and awards the winner money or points.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is based on, and claims priority from, provisionalapplication Ser. No. 61/033,383, filed Mar. 3, 2008, entitled WageringSystem for On-Line Gamers, by William Levy, incorporated herein byreference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to player vs. player interactive video games and,in particular, to a technique for the players to set up games via aremote system and the remote system automatically determining the winnerand controlling the players' financial accounts or points.

BACKGROUND

Video game systems such as Microsoft's X-Box and Sony PlayStation havethe capability of allowing players to compete against each other invideo games via the Internet. For example, X-Box Live™ is directed tothis feature. Almost 2 million players compete on-line each day playingHalo™, and other games are equally as popular.

Various on-line wagering systems are known that allow two players toopen individual accounts, via a remote server, and place bets on theoutcome of the video games. After the game is completed, the playersmust cooperate to manually enter the identification of the winner intothe remote server. The remote server then credits the account of thewinner and debits the account of the loser. Such wagering systems aredescribed in US publication nos. 2007/0135208 A1 and US 2007/0004509 A1,both incorporated herein by reference. Other references describingremote interactive gaming include U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,999,083 and7,218,739, both incorporated by reference. The present invention alsoapplies to awarding the players points rather than money.

Problems arise if the players do not cooperate in identifying a winnerto the remote wagering system.

What is needed is a verification system that automatically awards betsor points to winning players of on-line games, without requiring thatthe players manually enter the winner of the game.

SUMMARY

A verification system matches gamers with similar interests and skills,automatically keeps track of which players won on-line games, and grantsmoney or points to the winning players. The players set up financialaccounts via the Internet by, for example, depositing an amount of moneyinto their account.

The verification system keeps track of thousands of players' gameresults and the players' competitors and automatically determines aplayer's relative skill level at the various games that can be played.

To protect the players from cheaters and bad gamers, a player ratingsystem is set up that receives players' input about other players, andthe system automatically rates players on their reputations based onwins/losses, amounts wagered, number of games played without a dispute,friend referrals, activity in the gaming forums, and number of gamesplayed.

Once a game is set up by two or more players for competing against eachother in a video game, the players make wagers using any money in theiraccounts. The players then play against each other, independently of theverification system, using the conventional gaming networks offered byX-Box, PlayStation, Wii, and other advanced platforms. Typically, theplatform provider, such as Microsoft for X-Box, provides a networkingsite that allows the players to easily initiate competitive games viathe Internet, which are then played via the game provider's (e.g., Halo)server. The connection to the game server is set up by the platformprovider (e.g., via X-Box Live). The game provider's sever detects theplayers' controls and sends signals to all the players' consoles so allthe consoles react accordingly while the players are entering commands.In one embodiment of a game server, the players' consoles are updated 30times per second in response to players' commands.

After the game is completed, the verification system automaticallycommunicates with the game server to obtain information regarding theoutcome of the game, where the verification system is aware of the gamedue to the game being on a scheduled games list. The verification systemthen awards the winning player a monetary prize or points. In oneembodiment, after the game is completed, the game server sends an e-mailto the verification system in a certain format indicating the results ofthe game. The verification system parses the e-mail to determine thewinner and obtain other information and stores that information. Inanother embodiment, the game server or platform provider publishes theresults of each game on a website, and the verification systemautomatically analyzes the results to determine the winner. In anotherembodiment, the game server or platform provider publishes the win/losscareer summaries of each player, and the verification systemautomatically analyzes the results to determine the winner. The players'accounts are appropriately credited and debited by the verificationsystem.

Even though there is automatic verification by the system without playerinvolvement, the players still have an opportunity to dispute the game.The players have one hour after the game in which to register a dispute.A dispute team then immediately investigates the dispute. If the disputeis frivolous, the players' accounts are adjusted for the game outcome.If the dispute is adequate, the game is considered a draw and the betsare refunded minus a 10% dispute fee.

Examples of some video games that may use the verification systeminclude Halo, Madden NFL 09, NCAA 09, Tiger Woods Golf 09, and NBA Live09.

The verification system also is applicable to any competitive game ofskill or chance, including on-line chess, backgammon, etc.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating the major systems involved in settingup an on-line competitive game, playing the game, and automaticallyverifying the results of the game.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing one verification routine using an e-mailsent by the game server, or by the game console provider, or by theplayer consoles to the verification system to determine the game winner.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing another verification routine using gameresults published by the game server or platform provider to determinethe game winner.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing another verification routine usingplayers' win/loss career summaries published by the game server orplatform provider to determine the game winner.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing an overall process for registering,setting up games, and automatically verifying results.

Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention, referred to as a verification system (although itperforms various other functions), will now be described more fullyhereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some,but not all embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention maybe embodied in many different forms and should not be construed aslimited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodimentsare provided to illustrate the general invention concepts. In oneembodiment, the invention is carried out by a programmed verificationserver having a high speed Internet connection. Accordingly, thehardware may be conventional. One skilled in the art can program aserver to perform the processes described herein without undueexperimentation.

Glossary of Acronyms

Automated Game Verification, or AGV

Scheduled Games List (SGL)

Game Identifier (GID)

Competition Identifier (CID)

Game Validation Process (GVP)

FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a network in which players may set upgames using the verification system, play the games on-line, and havethe game results automatically verified. The verification systemincludes servers to set up the game and verify the game.

Setting Up a Game

In FIG. 1, player 1 represents a player at an X-Box or PlayStationconsole or other type of video game console. Player 2 represents anotherplayer at an X-Box or PlayStation console or other type of video gameconsole. The players are connected to the Internet with a high speedconnection such as cable or DSL. One of the players uses the console(connected to a video display) to access the WorldGaming Matchmakingwebsite server 12 and is led through instructions to set up acompetitive game with another player by issuing a challenge. (Theservers 12 and 14 identified in FIG. 1 include all memory for storingdata and the operating program used to carry out the processes describedherein.) At least the game type, players, and start time are designatedby the player. The other player is notified of the challenge by theWorldGaming Matchmaking server 12 e-mailing a message to the player, andthe player accepts the challenge by effectively checking a response boxand transmitting the acceptance to the Matchmaking server 12. Bothplayers must be registered with WorldGaming (the operator of theverification system) and have player IDs.

Once the match has been set up, any wagers, points, or other type ofreward are verified as being available, and the match is confirmed tothe players by an automatic e-mail generator. Other aspects of FIG. 1will be identified during the below description of the game andverification process. The invention primarily relies in theverification-related aspects of the process.

The present invention includes a system and process to automaticallydetermine a game winner using one of several methods, depending on thegame. This process and method is hereinafter referred to as AutomatedGame Verification, or AGV.

At the early days of console video gaming players played against thecomputer. As the console and games evolved, players were able to playagainst one-another on a single console. As Internet access became moreuniversal, and bandwidth increased, the games transitioned to allowplayers to play against one-another online, no longer requiring them tobe physically collocated.

The most current trend in online console video gaming is to supplyplayers with either per-game statistics and/or a career summary. Forinstance, some games, say a football video game, may show the userdetails about every game, such as points scored per quarter, possessiontime, etcetera. Others may provide career details such as totaltouchdowns, total running yards, total wins, total losses, etcetera.

The AGV is a continuously running process, performed by the verificationsystem (identified in FIG. 1 as the WorldGaming AGV server 14), thatmonitors scheduled games and attempts to verify their results using agame-specific verification algorithm. The scheduled games list (SGL) isprovided via a website, set up by the WorldGaming Matchmaking websiteserver 12, that allows players to schedule head-to-head games, joinmulti-tier scheduled tournaments, participate in leagues, play as ateam, and play in multi-player games. Multi-tier tournaments and leaguessupport both head-to-head, teams and multi-player competitions.

The scheduled games list (SGL) is ordered by earliest scheduled starttime first and includes the following key data (as well as additionaldata not required for the AGV process):

-   -   Game identifier (GID)—identifies the game being played (e.g.,        NHL 09, Halo3, Madden 09). The player may select the type of        game from a menu of games supported by the verification system,        and the system automatically associates the game with the proper        GID.    -   Competition identifier (CID)—identifies the specific        competition, which relates to entry fees to join the competition        and payout to the winner. The CID may also be tied to specific        game options. The verification system automatically assigns this        CID.    -   Scheduled start time—identifies when the game is supposed to        start. If this is a tournament, the start time is determined by        the verification system. If this is a game set up by the        players, the players enter a time of day and date for the start        of the game.    -   Gaming window—identifies how long the verification system should        look for results. This may be an automatic window based on        typically game durations. The verification system may begin        looking for result, for example, 30 minutes after the start time        and stop looking 4 hours after the start time.    -   Competitor list—identifies who is participating in this game.        The players are subscribers of the verification system and are        given ID codes. The game may be a head-to-head game, team game,        or multi-player game.        -   Head-to-head game: player1 vs. player2        -   Team game: (player1-team1, player2-team1, . . . ,            playerX-team1), (player1-team2, player2-team2, . . . ,            playerY-team2), . . . ,(player1-teamN, player2-teamN, . . .            , playerZ-teamN)        -   Multi-player: player1, player2, . . . , playerN

The GID provides game-specific information, such as, but not limited to:

-   -   Game name    -   Game logo    -   Game type—sports, first-person-shooter, racing, etcetera.    -   Game validation process (GVP) (which may be customized for the        particular game provider)    -   Supported video gaming console(s)    -   Minimum playing time—the shortest amount of time a game may        take.

The CID provides competition-specific information, such as, but notlimited to:

-   -   GID    -   Competition type (single game, multi-tier tournament, league)    -   Competitor type (head-to-head, team, multiplayer)    -   Game options (ranked or unranked, number of rounds/periods,        duration of each)    -   Competitor list (same as SGL Competitor list)    -   Entry fee    -   Management fee    -   Winner rewards    -   Loser rewards    -   If multi-tier tournament, then next game where the winner should        be promoted.

Playing a Game

Once the game is set up, the competing players then log onto the gameconsole network 16 (FIG. 1), which would be a Microsoft game network forX-Box and a Sony game network for PlayStation. This is conventional. Theconsole network then configures the player consoles to communicatedirectly with the game server 18 run by the game operator, such asBungie, Inc. for Halo. The game is then initiated, with the game server18 receiving game control signals (e.g., shooting commands) from thevarious players and controlling the players' consoles to react in acoordinated manner to all the players' control signals. Such game playis conventional.

Validating a Game Result

When the game is completed, the players log off, and the game validationprocess (GVP) is performed to determine the winner and award the winnera wagered amount, points, or other reward. The GVP is automaticallyperformed by the WorldGaming AGV server 14 in FIG. 1.

One function of a GVP is to provide duplicate-processing protection.Consider a scenario where a set of players are playing multipleback-to-back games. Depending on the spacing of the games and the gamingwindow, it is possible that a SGL will include multiple games with thesame game options and competitors. The challenge to the verificationsystem is to ensure that the correct games are validated andspecifically that a single game-played may not cause multiple games tovalidate.

The AGV process iterates through the SGL and, for each CID, triggers theGVP for the specific GID. The AGV process may also be responsible forthe following tasks, although these are not required to fulfill its corefunction:

-   -   Cancel competitions that were not accepted by all parties    -   Notify players when their games were not validated by the        expiration of their competition's gaming window.    -   Notify players of upcoming competitions for which they are        enrolled.

There are currently three families of GVP, depending on how the gamecreators are supplying results. The verification system may, forexample, use the GVP-DET-ONLINE verification process for Halo3 and theGVP-EMAIL process for a game that does not publish results. The threefamilies are:

-   -   1. (GVP-EMAIL) End-of-game emails being automatically sent from        the players' gaming consoles, game console provider, or game        server (e.g., for Halo3). The console, game console network, or        game server is preprogrammed to send the e-mail to the        verification system's e-mail address, and the contents and        format of the e-mail are precisely dictated by a software        program.    -   2. (GVP-DET-ONLINE) Detailed results of each game are published        online by the game server or game console provider and accessed        by the verification system.    -   3. (GVP-SUM-ONLINE) Player career summaries are published online        by the game server or game console provider and accessed by the        verification system.

Each GVP family is discussed in further detail below.

GVP-EMAIL

In one embodiment, the GVP-EMAIL process requires that players configuretheir games to e-mail the end-of-game results to a specific e-mailaddress. A menu walks the players through a form-filling process ontheir consoles. This may only need to be done one time for all futuregames of a certain type. Ideally, the e-mail address is unique to eachplayer, such as playerid@website.com, where the player includes his IDnumber in the address, but need not be so for this algorithm. Thisprocess requires that strict anti-spam measures be exercised to ensureforged results will not be accepted by the system. Anti-spam measuresare widely available and beyond the scope of this disclosure.

In another embodiment, which is preferred since there is no playerset-up, the game server sends an e-mail to the verification system(e.g., @worldgaming.com) after every game. Some game servers are alreadyconfigured to send an e-mail to the players at the end of the game, andthe e-mail address is changed to the worldgaming.com address instead of,or in addition to, the player's address. In another embodiment, theplatform provider (e.g., X-Box Live) may send the e-mail. A simplifiedexample of an e-mail to the verification system may be:

From: EA_Admin@ea.com

To: AGVserver@worldgaming.com

NCAA Football09

Mar. 3, 2009 at 11:30 pm

Final Score: joe z 36 vs. New BLUE 58

Statistics (detailed game statistics follow in the e-mail along with anyother information pertinent to the game or connection)

The AGV algorithm programmed in the AGV server 14 performs the followingsteps to determine which game the e-mail relates and the outcome of thegame:

-   -   Iterate through the verification system's e-mail inbox    -   Scan each e-mail to determine whether it matches the associated        GID        -   This is performed by locating identifying patterns in the            e-mail, such as the game name.    -   Determine game time (if not present in the e-mail, then use the        ‘sent-time’ in the e-mail headers)    -   Determine whether the game time is within the range of the CID        scheduled start time and gaming window    -   Extract game participants    -   Determine whether the participants match the CID Competitor List    -   Check game status: Was the game fully played? Was there a        disconnect? Some heuristics for this are game-specific. For        example, some games provide the total possession time for each        competitor. Since the CID includes game options, the algorithm        can determine the expected total possession time, then add the        possession time for each user to determine if the game was fully        played. Heuristics can also be established to say that even if a        game was disconnected, but still X % complete based on duration,        possession time, or any other metric, that the system should        count the results as valid.

If all the above conditions are met, then a potential match between thee-mail and the game has been found. The only remaining steps are toextract from the e-mail the score (and therefore winner), and determinewhether this e-mail is a duplicate of an e-mail for the same game butfrom a different user. This is not an issue if the game server sent thee-mail. Score extraction is a game-specific text pattern-matchingexercise. The e-mail format is predefined and the score for a certaingame will typically always occur at a specific relative position in thee-mail.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart describing a verification routine using an e-mailsent by the game server to the verification system to determine the gamewinner. In step 20, the GVP-EMAIL routine starts. The routine will berepeated if the game on the SGL is not detected.

In step 22, the AGV server's e-mail inbox is checked. If it is empty(step 24) the process keeps looping to check the inbox.

If there is an e-mail, the game ID (GID) in the e-mail is detected instep 26 (e.g., words in the e-mail matched with corresponding game namesin a look-up table). If the detected game time (step 28) of thecompetition (identified in the AGV server 14 as a Competition Identifier(CID)) occurred within a certain window after the scheduled start timein the SGL (step 30), it is determined that the e-mail still may bedirected to the game in the SGL.

In step 32, any game options in the e-mail are cross-referenced to theCID game options. If there is a match, the competitors listed in thee-mail are extracted (step 34), to determine whether they match thecompetitors in the CID (step 36). If there is a provision for ateam-based game to allow short-handed teams, a partial match of theplayers to the CID will not prevent the verification process fromproceeding (step 38).

In step 40, it is determined from the e-mail whether the game wasdisconnected before completion. If not, the verification processcontinues. If so, certain rules (heuristics) are applied (step 42) todetermine whether the game should count anyway, such as if the game wasalmost complete or if one player intentionally stopped the game whenlosing. If the game should not count, the game is classified as aninvalid game and is ignored (step 43).

The above process provides assurance that the e-mail is directed to aparticular game on the SGL. The scores are then extracted from thee-mail (step 44).

If the game is determined to be not tied (step 46), it is determinedwhether the e-mail is a duplicate (step 48) by looking up in a cache(step 50) whether the same scores, competitors, and game options werepresented in a recent earlier e-mail. If the e-mail has been determinedto not be a duplicate, the scores are validated (step 52) and acted uponby the AGV server 14, such as by awarding the winning player money orpoints, publishing the results on a webpage, and ranking the players.

If the e-mail is determined to be a duplicate, the e-mail is ignored(step 54).

If the game is a tie game (step 46) and the game time is still within agaming window time (step 56), the players are presented with an optionof replaying the game within the game window time (step 58). If the gamewindow has expired, the players are notified about options such asrescheduling the game, cancelling the game, or contacting customerservice for more options (step 60).

Duplicate-Processing Protection

The above-described GVP-EMAIL process contained steps to ensure that aduplicate e-mail will not be processed. Consider a scenario whereplayer1 and player2 are scheduled for two competitions of the same gameand options. The first competition is scheduled for 4:00 pm and thesecond at 4:30 pm. Now assume that there are e-mail delays, and resultse-mails (automatically sent by each of the game consoles) are receivedby the verification system at 4:20 pm, 4:45 pm, 4:52 pm, and 5:31 pm.The challenge is to ensure that the correct e-mails validate the correctcompetition. Assume that the four e-mails validated competitions1,1,2,2, respectively, or 1,2,2,1, respectively—there must be analgorithm to avoid mistaken validation of game 1 or 2.

To achieve this protection, the verification system's GVP-EMAIL processcontains a cache of the validated competitors list, CID, scores, andextracted game options and game-specific unique information (such ashome/away teams, etcetera) from past e-mails and other sources. At theend of its validation process described earlier, and right beforevalidating a CID (i.e., verifying game results), it determines whetherthe same data points were ‘recently’ seen. The ‘recently’ parameter isadjustable and, through testing, it was determined that 2 hours was areasonably successful timer. Therefore, repeat e-mails will essentiallybe ignored as applying to a game already processed by the verificationsystem.

GVP-DET-ONLINE

The GVP-DET-ONLINE process does not use e-mails for verification ofscores and does not require players to configure anything on their side.Instead, the verification system polls an online location where detailedgame results are published by the game authors (a trusted source). Thislocation may be the Halo server having a website at bungie.net, forexample. The publication of the game results by the game server on awebsite is conventional. The player's registered ID for the game serveris automatically entered by the verification system after accessing thegame server website after a game in order to access the player'spersonal game statistics. A simplified example may be as follows, whichshows the general format of the game results.

Game Name

Date/time game played and finished

Platform game was played on

Players' Names

Game statistics, including final scores

The AGV server 14 (FIG. 1) may be programmed to know the formats used byeach game website to more easily extract the pertinent information tovalidate the game results.

The GVP-DET-ONLINE algorithm performs the following steps:

-   -   Select a player from the competitors list (this step is also        used in duplicate-processing protection, discussed below).    -   Pull recent games for this player from the online source (e.g.,        Halo server, MLB09 server, etc.).    -   Determine game time    -   Determine whether the game time is within the range of the CID        scheduled start time and gaming window    -   Extract game participants    -   Determine whether the participants match the CID Competitor List    -   Check game status: Was the game fully played? Was there a        disconnect? Some heuristics for this are game-specific. For        example, some games provide the total possession time for each        competitor. Since the CID includes game options, the algorithm        can determine the expected total possession time, then add the        possession time for each user to determine if the game was fully        played. Heuristics can also be established to say that even if a        game was disconnected, but still X % complete based on duration,        possession time, or any other metric, that the system should        count the results as valid.

If all the above conditions are met, then a likely match has been found.The only remaining steps are to extract the score (and thereforewinner), and determine whether this result was already processed tovalidate a different game. Score extraction is a game-specific textpattern-matching exercise. Since the game server website typicallycontains information in a certain format, it is easy to associate thedata with its significance.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the GVP-DET-ONLINE process used todetermine the game winner. In step 62, the routine starts. The routinewill be rerun if the game results for a game listed on the SGL are notfound.

Since the game server webpage for the particular game played will listall players, only one of the players needs to be identified to pull upthe pertinent webpage. In step 64, the competitor with the smallest(numerically lowest) player ID number is used. The particular competitoris arbitrary, but only one is selected. In step 66, the last fetch timefor games played by that player is obtained from the cache. In step 68,all games involving that player published by the game server prior tothe last fetch time are ignored. In step 70, any games played by thatplayer within a time window after the CID listed on the SGL areconsidered for being the target game on the SGL. If no games appear,then the game server website has not published the results (step 72),and the last fetch time is updated (step 74).

If a game is detected in step 70, it is determined from the webpagewhether the game options match the CID game options in the SGL (step72). If so, the competitors are extracted from the web page (step 74)and matched to the competitors on the CID (step 76). If there is amatch, the game is assumed to be the target game on the SGL, and thescores are extracted from the webpage (step 44). Steps not specificallydiscussed in FIG. 3 are identical to the same-numbered steps in FIG. 2and need not be repeated.

In step 78, the “last fetch time” is updated in the cache to the starttime of step 62 for the particular competitor identified in step 64.

In another embodiment, the platform provider (e.g., X-Box Live) maypublish the game results, and the verification server accesses thatwebpage.

Duplicate-Processing Protection

The above-described GVP-DET-ONLINE process contained steps to ensurethat a duplicate e-mail will not be processed. Consider a scenario whereplayer1 and player2 are scheduled for two competitions of the same gameand options. The first competition is scheduled for 4:00 pm and thesecond at 4:30 pm. Now assume that the results are published atdifferent times for the two users, for example at 4:20 pm and 4:45 pmfor player1 and 4:52 pm and 5:31 pm for player2. The challenge for theverification system is to ensure that the correct results validate thecorrect competition.

To achieve this protection, the GVP-DET-ONLINE process contains a map ofeach player and the last time the system fetched its list of recentmatches. When the GVP selects “a player from the competitors list,” ituses an algorithm that, given the same set of players multiple times,will deterministically return the same player every time. There aremultiple ways of achieving this, such as selecting the smallest playerid(i.e., the lowest player ID number amongst the competitors), largestplayerid, first playername in alphabetical order, last playername inalphabetical order, etcetera. The exact method is not important, but thefact that the selected player is consistent is a requirement. Thisselection ensures that, when a competition with a set of players isvalidated, a particular player will be used to fetch the recent games,which avoids all potential duplicate-processing issues because identicalresults from that player will not be used to validate two games.

GVP-SUM-ONLINE

The GVP-SUM-ONLINE process, like the GVP-DET-ONLINE process, does notrequire players to configure anything on their side. Instead, the system(the AGV server 14) polls an online location where a player's careersummary statistics are published by the game authors (a trusted source).The publication of the career summary statistics by the game server on awebsite is conventional. The player's registered ID for the game serveris automatically entered by the verification system after accessing thegame server website after a game in order to pull down the player'spersonal career summary statistics. A simplified example may be asfollows, which shows the general format of the game results.

Game Name

Experience (total number of games played)

Total points

Game statistics

Wins

Loses

Rankings of top players

The AGV server 14 (FIG. 1) may be programmed to know the formats used byeach game website to more easily extract the pertinent information tovalidate the game results.

The GVP-SUM-ONLINE algorithm performs the following steps at thebeginning of each SGL scheduled start time. It is only performed onetime per CID:

-   -   Fetch current career summary for each competitor    -   Store career summary for each competitor

The above information provides the initial state for each competitor.Since only summary information is available, the algorithm mustcontinuously fetch career summaries until all players' “games played”increases by one, and then use the “career winnings” and “career losses”fields to determine who recently won a head-to-head, multi-player orteam-based game. This algorithm can also ensure that all team membersparticipated, since it requires all the competitors to have anadditional “games played”. The algorithm must also adapt to scenariossuch as one player running late and finishing a prior game right afterthe scheduled start time, causing his games-played to increase by one,but none of the other players' games to increase. The algorithmmaintains all the players' states so that, if it sees that in order tovalidate the game it requires one player to increase games-played bymore than others, it will only utilize the most recent changes todetermine winners/losers.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the GVP-SUM-ONLINE process used todetermine the game winner. In step 82, the routine starts. The routinewill be rerun if the game results for a game listed on the SGL are notfound.

In steps 84, 85, 86, and 87, an initial state (career summary) for allcompetitors of a particular game on the SGL is first set prior to gameplay. This will require accessing the players' career summaries from thegame server website using the players' ID codes for that game serverwebsite. Once the initial states are set, and after it is assumed thegame has been completed and the career summaries updated by the gameserver website, the website for one of the competitors (step 90) isselected to determine if there has been a change in his career summary(step 92). If there has been no change, no result is obtained (step 94)and the routine loops until a change has been detected.

If a change has been detected, the current states (i.e., the statesupdated after the game) for all the competitors are fetched from thewebsite (step 96). In step 98, it is determined whether all thecompetitors' career summaries have been updated from the initial state(either wins or losses will be +1). If not, the initial state isreplaced with the current state (step 100) and the routine loops untilall the competitors' career summaries have been updated by the gameserver after the game.

Once it is determined that all the competitors' career summaries havechanged, the AGV server 14 determines the winner(s) and loser(s) of thegame by comparing the current wins and losses for each competitor to theinitial states (step 102). The players' results are then validated (step104) and winners are awarded appropriately by the AGV server 14 by, forexample, crediting their account with any waged amounts by the players.

In another embodiment, the platform provider (e.g., X-Box Live) maypublish the career summaries, and the verification server accesses thatwebpage.

Summary of Registration, Game Set-Up, and Validation Process

FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing an overall process for registering,setting up games, and automatically verifying results. In steps 110 and112, a player accesses the WorldGaming website to register. Part of theregistration process is the player identifying his player ID(s) foraccessing his personal game statistics from game server websites so theverification system can automatically access game information todetermine who won games. For the embodiment where the player's console,game console provider, or game server sends an e-mail to the AGV server14 after a game, this e-mail set-up may also need to be performed by theplayer.

Upon registration, all users will have their own dedicated home pagethat displays all their gaming details. Other users can view these pagesand scope out their competition and leave comments on the comment boardor add other users as friends etc. All profile pages also have challengebuttons on them. If a user clicks challenge, a challenge card opens thatfirst asks that user to select a game that both users have in common.From here they are able to set all the details of the match and thenissue it to the other user. The other user is then notified throughe-mail via the worldgaming.com notification system. The other user canopen the proposed challenged and chat live in real time with the otheruser and confirm all the match details and then accept the match.

In step 114, it is determined whether the player wants to play for cashor points. If the player wants to play for cash, the player depositsmoney into an account (steps 116, 118). The player is now registered andcan set up challenges with other subscribers.

In step 120, the player enters the WorldGaming website and looks through“lobbies” for supported games and tournaments. The player then schedulesa match time with another player or enters a tournament (steps 122, 123,124, 125). Competitors may be automatically matched by WorldGaming basedon the players' rankings. The player may meet the opponent on-line (step126) in a chat room.

There are three ways for users to issue/receive a challenge online:

-   -   1. Through the game lobby, all players online challenge process    -   2. Through the game lobby, Fast Play    -   3. Through Active Avatars and player profile pages

Every game offered on the site has its own dedicated lobby that displaysall users who are currently online on the website and have that specificgame in their games list. The lobby displays the following userinformation: worldgaming.com username, site reputation, amount they liketo play for, and a taunt. By clicking the challenge button, a challengecard is activated that allows the user to set the preferences for theselected game and use the challenge to the other user. The challengecard then acts as a live chat where the users are able to chat in realtime and talk about the details of their game. The users then agree tothe setting of the game and agree to the site's terms or service. Theusers are then issued a game confirmation number and are ready to goplay the game.

There is a fast play button located in every lobby. Clicking “fast play”pulls up a challenge card that allows the user to set the details of thegame they want to play. Instead of issuing the challenge to anotheruser, fast play creates an open match that resides under the open matchtab in the game lobby. All users can browse the open matches and thenview the user they will be playing against and all the details of thematch. Upon another user joining the open match both users are then setto play the game and issued confirmation details.

In step 128, the game is played at around the scheduled time. This isperformed by the players independently of the verification system, andthe players use conventional game networks set up by Microsoft, Sony,and other game console providers to play the on-line game.

The AGV server 14 (FIG. 1) then verifies the result of the game, usingthe processes described above and in FIGS. 2-4. Such steps areidentified by steps 131-137 in FIG. 5.

After the results are validated, the AVG server 14 then determines ifthe game was a money game (step 140) and, if so, allocates the funds andgame management fees (e.g., 10%) (step 142). If the game was not a moneygame, the server 14 allocates points, bonuses, or other rewards to theplayer(s) (step 144). If the game is a multi-tier tournament game (step146), the winner of the round is notified (step 148).

In step 150, the competitors are notified of the results of the game.The process then ends (step 152) until another game is played.

Having described the invention in detail, those skilled in the art willappreciate that, given the present disclosure, modifications may be madeto the invention without departing from the spirit and inventiveconcepts described herein. Therefore, it is not intended that the scopeof the invention be limited to the specific embodiments illustrated anddescribed.

1. A method performed by a programmed verification server and associatedmemory remote from player video game consoles and remote from a gameserver running an on-line video game played on the consoles, the methodcomprising: maintaining records of players; receiving inputs fromplayers desiring to play a competitive game against each other on gameconsoles starting at a particular time; after the game has been playedindependently of the verification server, using the game consoles andgame server, automatically receiving by the verification server, withoutplayer involvement, information from the remote game server, gameconsole provider, or one or more players' game consoles indicatingresults of the game sufficient to determine which player won the game;storing in a memory data indicating the winner of the game; and grantingthe winner an award.
 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step ofautomatically receiving information comprises: receiving an e-mail bythe verification server containing information about the game generatedby the game server, the information comprising players' identifications,game identification, time of the game, and results of the game;detecting contents of the e-mail by the verification server identifyingthat the game played is a particular game scheduled for play by one ofthe players; detecting the results of the game from the e-mail; andstoring the results in a memory and making the results available forview on a website.
 3. The method of claim 2 wherein receiving an e-mailcomprises receiving an e-mail sent by the game server.
 4. The method ofclaim 2 wherein receiving an e-mail comprises receiving an e-mail sentby at least one of the players' game consoles.
 5. The method of claim 1wherein the step of automatically receiving information comprises:accessing, by the verification server, a website containing informationabout the game, the website being generated independently of theverification server and containing information automatically generatedby the game server, the information comprising players' identifications,game identification, time of the game, and results of the game;detecting contents of the website by the verification server identifyingthat the game played is a particular game scheduled for play by one ofthe players; detecting the results of the game from the website; andstoring the results in a memory and making the results available forview on a second website.
 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the step ofautomatically receiving information comprises: accessing, by theverification server, a website containing a performance summary of aplayer that competed in the game, the website being generatedindependently of the verification server and containing informationautomatically generated by the game server, the information comprisingplayer identifications, game identification, and a summary of results ofmultiple games played over a period of time; detecting a change in theperformance summary of the player, signaling that the website has beenrecently updated with the results of the game that was scheduled forplay by the player; determining the results of the game from thewebsite; and storing the results in a memory and making the resultsavailable for view on a second website.
 7. The method of claim 1 furthercomprising the verification server detecting contents of a scheduledgames list (SGL) that comprises the game to be played, the scheduledstart time, and the players.
 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the stepof storing in the memory data indicating the winner of the gamecomprises: detecting the information received from the remote gameserver, the game console provider, or the one or more players' gameconsoles indicating results of the game, the information including thegame played, a start time of the game, at least one of the players, andresults of the game played; comparing the game played, a start time ofthe game, and at least one of the players to the game to be played, thescheduled start time, and the players from the scheduled games list; andif there is a match, detecting the results of the game played andstoring in the memory data indicating the winner of the game.
 9. Themethod of claim 8 wherein detecting the information received from theremote game server, the game console provider, or the one or moreplayers' game consoles comprises detecting the information received fromonly the remote game server.
 10. The method of claim 1 wherein grantingthe winner an award comprises granting the winner a monetary award. 11.The method of claim 1 wherein granting the winner an award comprisesgranting the winner a monetary award and transferring money from a firstaccount into the winning player's account.
 12. The method of claim 1wherein granting the winner an award comprises granting the winnerpoints.
 13. A programmed verification server remote from player videogame consoles and remote from a game server running an on-line videogame played on the consoles, the server being programmed to perform themethod comprising: maintaining records of players; receiving inputs fromplayers desiring to play a competitive game against each other on gameconsoles starting at a particular time; after the game has been playedindependently of the verification server, using the game consoles andgame server, automatically receiving by the verification server, withoutplayer involvement, information from the remote game server, gameconsole provider, or one or more players' game consoles indicatingresults of the game sufficient to determine which player won the game;storing in a memory data indicating the winner of the game; and grantingthe winner an award.
 14. The server of claim 13 wherein the step ofautomatically receiving information comprises: receiving an e-mail bythe verification server containing information about the game generatedby the game server, the information comprising players' identifications,game identification, time of the game, and results of the game;detecting contents of the e-mail by the verification server identifyingthat the game played is a particular game scheduled for play by one ofthe players; detecting the results of the game from the e-mail; andstoring the results in a memory and making the results available forview on a website.
 15. The server of claim 14 wherein receiving ane-mail comprises receiving an e-mail sent by the game server.
 16. Theserver of claim 13 wherein the step of automatically receivinginformation comprises: accessing, by the verification server, a websitecontaining information about the game, the website being generatedindependently of the verification server and containing informationautomatically generated by the game server, the information comprisingplayers' identifications, game identification, time of the game, andresults of the game; detecting contents of the website by theverification server identifying that the game played is a particulargame scheduled for play by one of the players; detecting the results ofthe game from the website; and storing the results in a memory andmaking the results available for view on a second website.
 17. Theserver of claim 13 wherein the step of automatically receivinginformation comprises: accessing, by the verification server, a websitecontaining a performance summary of a player that competed in the game,the website being generated independently of the verification server andcontaining information automatically generated by the game server, theinformation comprising player identifications, game identification, anda summary of results of multiple games played over a period of time;detecting a change in the performance summary of the player, signalingthat the website has been recently updated with the results of the gamethat was scheduled for play by the player; determining the results ofthe game from the website; and storing the results in a memory andmaking the results available for view on a second website.
 18. Themethod of claim 13 further comprising the verification server beingprogrammed to detect contents of a scheduled games list (SGL) thatcomprises the game to be played, the scheduled start time, and theplayers, wherein the step of storing in a memory data indicating thewinner of the game comprises: detecting the information received fromthe remote game server, game console provider, or the one or moreplayers' game consoles indicating results of the game, the informationincluding the game played, a start time of the game, at least one of theplayers, and results of the game played; comparing the game played, astart time of the game, and at least one of the players to the game tobe played, the scheduled start time, and the players from the scheduledgames list; and if there is a match, detecting the results of the gameplayed and storing in the memory data indicating the winner of the game.19. The server of claim 18 wherein detecting the information receivedfrom the remote game server, game console provider, or the one or moreplayers' game consoles comprises detecting the information received fromonly the remote game server.
 20. The server of claim 13 wherein grantingthe winner an award comprises granting the winner a monetary award andtransferring money from a first account into the winning player'saccount